Comparison

NumberBroom vs. IPQualityScore

How is NumberBroom different from IPQualityScore?

Short answer

IPQualityScore is a fraud-prevention platform with a strong phone product, built for continuous, high-volume validation wired into a signup or checkout flow. Two things are worth knowing before you compare. Their paid plans are monthly or yearly subscriptions with a monthly lookup allowance, so the entry point is a plan rather than a $5 job, and their pricing page showed visitors no plan grid when we loaded it in a browser: ask them for current prices. And their DNC and TCPA litigator data are add-ons an account manager has to switch on -- the fields return null until then, and their own documentation says the DNC data "may not be 100% current". NumberBroom has no plan: $0.20 per number, $5 minimum, and it runs the litigator check on every job by default.

Checking a whole list? Preview 20 rows of it free →

On this page

These two get compared because both will tell you whether a phone number is real, and there the similarity stops. IPQualityScore is a fraud-prevention platform that happens to have an excellent phone product. NumberBroom is a compliance-shaped tool for people who already have a list and have to decide what to do with it this week. The honest version of this comparison concedes a lot of ground.

Plans against paying per list

How IPQualityScore and NumberBroom charge, from the plan data in IPQualityScore's pricing page
IPQualityScoreNumberBroom
Pricing modelMonthly or yearly subscription plansPay as you go, per list
PlansFree, Startup, SMB Basic and SMB+None
Lookups included1,000 a month on Free (35 a day); 5,000, 10,000 and 75,000 a month on the paid plansPay per job: $0.20 per number to 2,000 rows, $0.16 to 5,000, $0.08 to 10,000
Smallest paid entryA plan, billed whether or not you run a list that monthA $5 minimum job
Plan grid visible to a browser visitorNo, as of October 8, 2026Yes: the pricing page
Try before you payFree planFree 20-row preview, guest checkout

Their pricing page showed no plan grid when we loaded it in a browser on October 8, 2026, because the script that draws it was refused. The plans above come from the plan data embedded in the page, last updated September 28, 2026, not from a grid a visitor can see, and IPQualityScore publishes no per-lookup rate, so confirm current plans and prices with them before you rely on any of it.

The difference that decides it is commitment

IPQualityScore's paid plans are billed monthly or yearly, and their phone-validation page says there are "no monthly contracts". Even so, the smallest paid entry is a plan, billed whether or not you run a list in August.

NumberBroom has no plan to be on. A 100-row list is $20, a 25-row list is $5, and a month with no lists is nothing. At one list a quarter, a subscription is the wrong shape however its allowance is priced.

Where the products genuinely diverge

The field lists tell the story. Theirs is built to answer "is this person a fraud risk": fraud score, recent abuse, prepaid status, SMS-pumping risk, leaked credentials, porting history. Ours is built to answer "is it safe and worthwhile to dial this row": line type, carrier, whether the line looks disconnected, and whether the number belongs to somebody who files TCPA suits for a living.

Litigator screening: included here, enabled there

IPQualityScore does have do_not_call and tcpa_blacklist fields. Both are add-ons an account manager switches on, both return null until they are, do_not_call is USA and Canada only, and their documentation itself cautions that the DNC data may not be fully current. Add-on pricing is not published.

On NumberBroom the litigator check is not a tier, an add-on or a conversation. It runs on every valid US number, at the same $0.20, because screening the list was the reason the product exists.

Neither of these is a knock on a well-built platform aimed at a different buyer. It does mean that if TCPA exposure is the thing keeping you up, the product where that check is standard is a different purchase from the product where it is a phone call with an account manager.

Quick check: a plan or pay per list?

Pick an answer to see whether it is right, and why.

1. How are IPQualityScore's paid plans billed?

Right. As of October 8, 2026, the plan data in their pricing page lists Startup (5,000 lookups), SMB Basic (10,000) and SMB+ (75,000), each billed monthly or yearly.

Not quite. IPQS publishes no per-lookup rate. The smallest paid entry is a plan, billed whether or not you run a list that month (as of October 8, 2026).

Not quite. That is how NumberBroom charges: per list, after a free 20-row preview, with nothing owed between jobs.

2. You need TCPA litigator screening. What does an IPQualityScore plan bought from the pricing page give you?

Not quite. Their tcpa_blacklist field is an add-on an account manager has to enable, so it is not part of a plan you buy off the pricing page.

Right. Their documentation lists do_not_call and tcpa_blacklist as add-ons an account manager enables, both returning null until then, and add-on pricing is not published. On NumberBroom the litigator check runs on every valid US number, at the same $0.20.

Not quite. It would be wrong to say that. The tcpa_blacklist field exists; it is an add-on an account manager has to enable.

3. How do phone lookups count against an IPQualityScore plan, per its pricing page?

Not quite. Their plan data gives each plan one lookup allowance rather than one per product (as of October 8, 2026), so phone does not get a separate pool as far as the pricing page shows.

Right. As of October 8, 2026, the plan data gives each plan a single lookup allowance, so as far as the pricing page shows one budget covers all of their products. It does not say how a phone lookup counts against it, or whether unused lookups roll over, so ask them if your volume is concentrated in one product.

Not quite. Whether unused lookups roll over or expire is not stated on any page we read, so the page makes no such claim.

4. Which job is NumberBroom built for, rather than IPQualityScore?

Not quite. That is IPQualityScore's home ground: fraud score, recent abuse, prepaid status, SMS-pumping risk and leaked credentials.

Right. NumberBroom's narrower set is aimed at that one decision: line type, carrier, an activity score that identifies disconnected numbers, and whether the number belongs to somebody who files TCPA suits for a living.

Not quite. IPQualityScore does that, comfortably: its documented response carries 25+ fields. NumberBroom returns a deliberately narrower set.

Which to pick

  1. Continuous, high-volume validation wired into a signup or checkout flow. That is IPQualityScore's home ground, and the fraud signals are real value we do not offer.
  2. Periodic list hygiene before an outbound push, where the spend is lumpy and TCPA exposure is the actual worry. Paying for a monthly plan to answer an occasional question is the wrong shape.
  3. Both, at different layers, which is common enough. Score traffic at the edge with a fraud platform; scrub the call list before the dialer runs.

For how the rest of the market sells this, see how DNC and litigator scrubbing is sold, or check a single number with the free carrier lookup.

Frequently asked questions

How is IPQualityScore priced?

On monthly or yearly subscription plans. Their pricing page showed visitors no plan grid when we loaded it in a browser on October 8, 2026, because the script that draws it was refused, but the plan data embedded in the page, last updated September 28, 2026, lists a Free plan with 1,000 lookups a month and three paid plans, Startup (5,000 lookups), SMB Basic (10,000) and SMB+ (75,000), each billed monthly or yearly. IPQS publishes no per-lookup rate. Ask IPQualityScore for current plans and prices rather than relying on a third-party page, ours included.

The paid plans are subscriptions, so the smallest paid entry is a plan, billed whether or not you run a list that month. NumberBroom has nothing to subscribe to: pay per list, after a free 20-row preview.

Does IPQualityScore check TCPA litigators and the DNC list?

Yes, with conditions, and it would be wrong to say they do not. Their documentation lists two relevant fields, do_not_call and tcpa_blacklist. Both are add-ons that an account manager has to enable, and both return null until that happens, so they are not part of a plan you buy off the pricing page. do_not_call covers the USA and Canada only, and their own docs note it "may not be 100% current with the latest DNC blocklists", directing you to contact support to enable better DNC data and litigator removal. Add-on pricing is not published, so we do not know what that costs. On NumberBroom the litigator check is not an add-on or a conversation; it runs on every valid US number in every job at the standard $0.20.

Which one returns more information about a phone number?

IPQualityScore, comfortably. Their documented response carries 25+ fields, including line type across seven categories, carrier, active status (itself an add-on that returns null until it is enabled), a 0-100 fraud score, prepaid and VOIP flags, recent-abuse and spammer signals, city, region, zip and timezone, mobile country and network codes, porting history with a last-ported date, SMS-pumping risk and leaked-credential indicators. NumberBroom returns a deliberately narrower set aimed at one decision: line type, carrier and an activity score that identifies disconnected numbers. The API also returns the E.164 form and a litigator flag per number; a CSV job removes litigator matches rather than flagging them. If you are scoring signup fraud, their field list is the point. If you are deciding which rows of a call list to dial, most of it is not.

Can I use IPQualityScore without writing code?

Yes, on a paid plan. They are API-first but there is a dashboard CSV upload and a bulk validation CSV API alongside it. The plan data in their pricing page marks CSV uploads as unavailable on the free plan and available on the paid ones, and the page no longer states an upload allowance for any plan. NumberBroom is CSV-first by design, with the API as the secondary door rather than the main one.

Do IPQualityScore's phone lookups use the same credits as their other products?

Their plan data gives each plan one lookup allowance rather than one per product, so as far as the pricing page shows, one budget covers all of their products. The page does not say how a phone lookup counts against it. Rather than guess, treat this as a question to ask them directly if your volume is concentrated in one product. Whether unused credits roll over or expire is likewise not stated on any page we read.

Not legal advice. NumberBroom is a phone data and list hygiene tool, not a law firm. This page summarises publicly available federal rules as of October 23, 2026 and is provided for general information only. TCPA and state telemarketing law change frequently and apply differently depending on your business, your consent records, and the states you call. Consult qualified counsel before relying on any of it.
One list, five dollars, no plan.
Carrier validation and a TCPA litigator check on every valid US number in your CSV. $0.20 per number, $5 minimum, nothing owed between jobs.
Preview 20 rows free

Founder, NumberBroom · 10 years in telecommunications and marketing

Cameron Hoffman is the founder of NumberBroom and has spent 10 years working in telecommunications and marketing. He built NumberBroom after repeatedly watching outbound teams dial purchased lists that were full of dead numbers, landlines and TCPA litigators.